¶1As the conviction of the defendant of an assault with intent to kill was, in all respects, regular, and the precedent steps leading to that result were of like validity, it only remains to say that the *480judgment must be.affirmed because the bill of exceptions, so-called, was filed in-vacation, and no order was entered of record at the preceding term permitting this to be done.
124 Mo. 479
State v. Jones
Decided November 5, 1894
Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1894-11-05
—Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge. . Under the statute, bills of exceptions must be filed at the term at which the appeal was allowed, unless, by consent of parties, the court enters an order of record, extending the time for filing the same. R. S. 1889/ sec. 2168.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1906
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1894-11-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →