Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 Mo. App. 499

Monett State Bank v. Eubanks

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1907

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1907-04-16

— Hon. F. O. Johnston, Judge. A holder of negotiable papers as collateral for a pre-existing debt and having given no consideration therefor and not being an innocent purchaser for value before maturity, holds it liable to equities existing between the original parties. Wine Co. v. Rinehart, 42 Mo. App. 171.

Relies on Hagerman v. Sutton · Logan v. Smith · Boatmen's Savings Bank v. Grewe

'Affirmed · Decided 1907-04-16

BLAND, P. J.

¶1(after stating the facts). — An indorsee of an underdue negotiable promissory note, taken as collateral security for a loan made at the time, is a holder for value and is not affected by any equities between the makers and the payee, of which he had no notice. [Logan v. Smith, 62 Mo. 455; Deere v. Marsden, 88 Mo. 512; Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. Abernathy, 32 Mo. App. 211.] And if the collateral note is secured by a mortgage, the latter passes to the indorsee as an incident to the note. [Hagerman v. Sutton, 91 Mo. 519, 4 S. W. 73; The Boatmen’s Saving Bank v. Grewe, 84 Mo. 477; Johnson v. Johnson, 81 Mo. 331.] Neither in what was stricken out, nor what remained in the answer is it stated that either bank had any notice of any infirmities in the note sued on, or of the original note of which it is a renewal, therefore, there is no legal defense stated in the answer, and the peremptory instruction to find for plhintiff was the only one that should have been given under the pleadings and the evidence.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.
/124/moapp/499 · .json · Public domain