124 N.C. App. 310 - Barber v. Continental Grain Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'n · 78 N.C. App. 358 - Martin v. Hare · Nelson v. Battle Forest Friends Meeting · Potter v. Tyndall · 108 N.C. App. 641 - Nelson v. Battle Forest Friends Meeting
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No constitutional claim, state or federal, appears in plaintiffs' pleadings or in any other documentation filed with the trial court prior to its ruling. While the argument of plaintiffs' counsel at pages 81 and 82 of the transcript of the summary judgment hearing does mention the phrase "unconstitutional," neither the trial court's "Order Granting Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment" nor "the record . . . indicate that the trial court considered the issue in granting summary judgment." Nelson, 108 N.C. App. at 646, 425 S.E.2d at 7. Accordingly, we do not address plaintiffs' constitutional arguments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Appellate courts will not ordinarily pass upon a constitutional question unless it affirmatively appears that such question was raised and passed upon in the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.