Nika v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Luurtsema v. Commissioner of Correction (2011), Young v. State (2009)
8 federal appellate · 6 district · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Teague v. Lane · Griffith v. Kentucky · Francis v. Franklin · Mills v. Maryland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assert [edi specific COURT OF APPEALS OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947B ce factual allegations that are not belied or repelled by the record and that, if true, would entitle him to relief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]f a rule is new but not a constitutional rule, it has no retroactive application to convictions that are final at the time of the change in the law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]othing in the language of Byford suggests that decision was grounded in constitutional concerns.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.