Hallmark v. Eldridge’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
January 2024
most recently cited
60 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Morales v. American Honda Motor Co. · Pellegrini v. State · Beattie v. Thomas · State v. Dantonio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) he or she must be qualified in an area of scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge (the qualification requirement); (2) his or her specialized knowledge must assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue (the assistance requirement); and (3) his or her testimony must be limited to matters within the scope of [his or her specialized] knowledge (the limited scope requirement).”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) within a recognized field of expertise; (2) testable and has been tested; (3) published and subjected to peer review; (4) generally accepted in the scientific community (not always determinative); and (5) based more on particularized facts rather than assumption, conjecture, or generalization.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“claims of prejudice concerning errors in the admission of evidence [are reviewed] based upon whether the error substantially affected the rights of the appellant”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.