Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 N.J. 582 - State v. Ivory

State v. Ivory’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
9
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently January 2020 · most notably State v. Vasquez (1992), State v. Maldonado (1994)

2 federal appellate · 62 state decisions

3101991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. · NJ Builders, Owners and Managers Association v. Blair · State v. Meinken · 229 N.J. Super. 459 - State v. Ogar · State v. Edwards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an objectively reasonable person could know that the school property was used regularly, consistently, and actually for school purposes.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “distributing, dispensing or possessing with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance or controlled substance analog while on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the Legislature intended to create drug-free zones of safety where children could be, learn and play free of the potential infection of drugs. One contaminating these safety zones is liable, regardless of whether he or she intended to infect those here or others elsewhere. Such a stance is legitimate and warranted in the effort to prevent primary and secondary school students in this state from using drugs. The statute presents a rational and reasonable approach by the Legislature to reduce drugs around schools. [Id. at 594-95, 592 A.2d 205 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.