State v. Marquez’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably State v. Aponte (1999), State v. Roman (1998)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3509
Relies on State v. Woodward · State v. Smith · State v. Worley · State v. Ross · State of Arizona v. Gevrez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reasonable control over the mode and order of interrogating witnesses and presenting evidence so as to (1) make the interrogation and presentation effective for the ascertainment of the truth, ... and (3) protect witnesses from harassment or undue embarrassment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State“[a] variance is not fatal unless the accused cannot reasonably anticipate from the indictment what the nature of the proof against him will be.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Urioste“The mere assertion of prejudice, without more, is insufficient to establish prejudicial error warranting reversal of a conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Urioste
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.