124 Ohio App. 3d 373 - State v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “does not arise until the trial court decides to incarcerate the offender for failure to pay.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Swift, Unpublished Decision (4-1-2005) · State v. Swift, Unpublished Decision (4-1-2005)

2. “By requiring a hearing prior to incarceration for nonpayment of fines, R.C. 2947.14 (A) protects the right of a criminal defendant not to be imprisoned for nonpayment of a fine due to indigency. * * * An offender may be incarcerated for his unwillingness to pay a fine, but not, consistent with the constitutional principles of due process and equal protection, for his inability to pay.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Self, Unpublished Decision (3-14-2005)