Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Ohio App. 3d 423 - State v. Carter

124 Ohio App. 3d 423 - State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
2
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably State v. Beasley (Slip Opinion) (2018), 171 Ohio St. 3d 524 - State v. Hill (2022)

74 state decisions

4201997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Kelley · City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGee · Hall China Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an Alford plea is merely a species of guilty plea, having the effect of waiving Carter's right to appeal from the denial of his speedy trial motion.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Pursuant to Crim. R. 11(B)(2), `[t]he plea of no contest is not an admission of defendant's guilt, but is an admission of the truth of the facts alleged in the indictment, information, or complaint and such plea or admission shall not be used against the defendant in any subsequent civil or criminal proceedings.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]lthough the trial court has the discretion to refuse to accept a no-contest plea, it must exercise its discretion based on the facts and circumstances before it, not on a blanket policy that affects all defendants regardless of their circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.