Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Ohio App. 3d 468 - Rogers v. Hill

124 Ohio App. 3d 468 - Rogers v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

185
cited by 185 later decisions
1
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

185 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 185 later decisions — most recently October 2025 · most notably 162 Ohio App. 3d 21 - Smith v. Wunsch (2005), 181 Ohio App. 3d 221 - Myers v. Wild Wilderness Raceway, L.L.C. (2009)

185 state decisions

7201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dehass · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · 79 Ohio App. 3d 667 - State v. Caldwell · State v. Grant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 185 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ultimately, the trier of fact has (1) the discretion to award attorney fees or not award attorney fees and (2) the discretion to decide on evidence showing the reasonableness of the time spent on the matter and the hourly rate. A trial court may believe all, part, or none of the testimony of any witness who appears before it.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial court is entitled to make its own determination as to the weight of the evidence and, more important, credibility of the witnesses because it is in the best position to observe the witnesses' gestures and voice inflections.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`passive nondisclosure' but does not shield the seller from an `active' fraud or commission (as opposed to a fraud of omission), i.e., a misrepresentation or fraudulent concealment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.