124 Ohio App. 3d 508 - Plotts v. Hodge’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Ohio App. 3d 822 - Strah v. Lake County Humane Society · 76 Ohio App. 3d 848 - State Ex Rel. Billis v. Summers · 111 Ohio App. 3d 479 - Reisig v. Camarato · 107 Ohio App. 3d 456 - Rogers v. Village of Wakeman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the trial court still had jurisdiction to consider a complaint for declaratory judgment or injunction after the replacement was seated * * * the trial court would, in effect, be permitted to tread upon the exclusive jurisdiction of the appellate courts and the Supreme Court of Ohio in quo warranto *Page 6 because the declaratory judgment would of necessity determine many of the very issues that must be ruled upon in a quo warranto proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.