Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Ohio App. 3d 570 - State v. Cooney

124 Ohio App. 3d 570 - State v. Cooney’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2024

22 state decisions

1001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Adams · State v. Baker · 9 Ohio App. 3d 216 - State v. Clay · 97 Ohio App. 3d 415 - State v. Jacot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant appealed and the court of appeals held that his statutory right to a speedy trial had been violated as to the second indictment because the speedy-trial clock for those charges began to run on the date of his arrest, not on the date of the second indictment. The supreme court disagreed with the court of appeals, holding that the defendant's speedy-trial rights had not been violated. Citing Adams, the court stated:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In Baker , the defendant was arrested because he sold prescription drugs to police informants. The same day, police officers seized numerous financial records from two pharmacies the defendant owned. A week later, the defendant was indicted on several counts of drug trafficking relating to the controlled buys.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We do not believe that [appellant's] speedy trial rights should be ignored simply because the laboratory processing the blood test failed to provide the results within a reasonable time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.