Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 Ohio St. 3d 1237

State v. Porter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2010

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2010-03-04

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 2010

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Singleton · State v. Fuller

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent: The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. II.

¶2{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Singleton, 124 Ohio St.3d 173, 2009-Ohio-6434, 920 N.E.2d 958.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur.Lanzinger, J., concurs for the reasons stated in her concurring opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726.Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State v. Fuller, 124 Ohio St.3d 543, 2010-Ohio-726.
/124/ohiost3d/1237 · .json · Public domain