Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 P.3d 856 - People v. Schupper

People v. Schupper’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2021

10 state decisions

50200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. · United States v. Murphy · United States v. O'Keefe · United States v. Jordan · Bryce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]ven if a judge is convinced of his or her own impartiality, disqualification is nonetheless required if circumstances compromise the appearance of fairness and impartiality, such that the parties and the public are left with substantial doubt as to the ability of the judge to fairly and impartially resolve pending litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It appears that the personal antagonism between counsel demonstrated in the past will continue. While I would not have problems dealing with these various personal issues among other counsel, I will feel uncomfortable handling them if [my friend and former supervisor] is involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the same circumstances that led the trial judge to recuse himself from defendant's other cases also existed before the commencement of [the March 2002] trial in this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.