¶1 No issues were raised on the trial of this case but questions of fact, which were for the decision of the trial judge sitting without a jury. His findings in favor of the plaintiff are supported by testimony not inherently improbable and have the force and effect of the verdict of a jury. They were sustained by the court in banc, which refused a new trial.
¶2 No sufficient reason has been given us for reversing this action of the court below.
¶3 Judgment affirmed,