State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Rochin v. People of California · Malinski v. People of State of New York · 732 So. 2d 1065 - Banks v. State · 462 So. 2d 1082 - State v. Glosson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) knowingly traveling within this state, (2) for the purpose of engaging in any illegal act (in violation of chapters 794, 800, or 827, or other unlawful sexual conduct) with the victim after using a computer or other electronic data storage transmission to contact a child, (3) the victim was a child or person believed by the defendant to be a child, and (4) the defendant seduced, solicited, lured, enticed or attempted to do so to engage .in the illegal act or unlawful sexual conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[it] was reasonable for the trial court to conclude that such communication tools and modes are so ubiquitous today as to no longer require any level of sophistication to use them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fureman“Any person who knowingly uses a computer online service ... to [s]olicit ... commits a felony of the third degree....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pinder v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.