Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 So. 3d 592 - State v. Arnold

124 So. 3d 592 - State v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · McKay v. Jobin · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · Anchors v. United States · State v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the responsibility of the court to exercise reasonable control over the presentation of the evidence. The trial judge is left with wide discretion as to the admissibility of evidence under pertinent evidence rules. The decision of the trial judge will not be overturned absent a clear abuse of discretion by the trial judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.