Ray v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 880 So. 2d 1044 - Spencer v. State · 856 So. 2d 721 - Riley v. Town of Lambert · Dixon v. State · 54 So. 3d 322 - Reeves v. City of Crystal Springs · 984 So. 2d 1086 - Hill v. City of Wiggins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule requires two separate bonds or cash deposits that serve two distinct purposes. The dismissal is proper because [in Ray,} Ray filed one sheet of paper versus two — not because Ray filed one sheet of paper ... but because Ray only secured the payment of costs without separately securing his appearance. Because he did not file both bonds, his appeal was not perfected. That’s under Rule 12.02(A)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Ray ... does hereby file with the Court the costs of perfecting his appeal in the amount of one hundred thirty eight dollars ($138.50) which .the undersigned is hereby bound. The condition of the bond is that, if the undersigned ... shall prosecute this appeal and if for any reason the appeal is dismissed, the costs as posted shall be forfeited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rule 12.02 makes plain that it is the appellant’s filing of the written notice and posting of both bonds that perfects the appeal, not the acceptance by the circuit clerk.” Ray , 124 , So.3d at 84 (¶ 14). 2 . In Ray , this Court observed that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.