Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 SO3D 841 - Wickham v. State

Wickham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Boykin v. Alabama · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[first, that] the alleged omissions are of such magnitude as to constitute a serious error or substantial deficiency falling measurably outside the range of professionally acceptable performance and, second, [that] the deficiency in performance compromised the appellate process to such a degree as to undermine confidence in the correctness of the result.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.