Corbett v. Wade’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1939
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hedtke v. Hedtke · Jordan Marsh Co. v. Hedtler · Fanchier v. Gammill · Reynolds v. Rice · Magee v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This is a suit for necessaries furnished the appellant’s wife. “The appellant is E. B. Corbett, the defendant in the trial court. The appellee is Mrs. A. W. Crosby, the plaintiff in the trial court, joined by her husband. The necessaries were furnished by appellee in September, October, and December, 1935, and in May, 1936. Subsequently, in October, 1936, Mrs. Corbett sued for and was granted a divorce from appellant, E. B. Corbett. Appellee filed this suit in August, 1937. “The trial was before the County Court at Law of Harris County, Texas, without a jury, and judgment was rendered for plaintiffs in the sum of $287.95, with six per cent interest from the date of the conclusion of the trial. It is from this judgment that the defendant, E. B. Cor-bett, appealed. The plaintiffs were denied recovery for a $100.00 portion of their total claim, from which denial no appeal is taken.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Corbett v. Crosby
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.