Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

124 S.W.3d 52

State v. Turner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 2004

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2004-01-20

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2017

14 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-01-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Charles Turner appeals his conviction for second degree assault, Section 565.060 RSMo 2000, and sentence of twelve years imprisonment. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutor’s improper remarks during closing argument. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

¶3Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

/124/sw3d/52 · .json · Public domain