Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 SW3D 672 - Ingram v. State

Ingram v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 104th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Clewis v. State · Sutton v. United States · Berkery v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Legislature may classify law violators and impose different penalties, inhi bitions and restrictions upon the several classes, provided there is a reasonable basis for the classification. In determining whether there is a reasonable basis for the classification there is a general presumption that the Legislature has done its duty, not violated the Constitution; and therefore the classification will be upheld unless it appears, clearly and without doubt, that it has no reasonable basis of support.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] substance, including a drug, an adulterant, a dilutant, an immediate precursor, listed in Schedules I through V or Penalty Groups 1, 1-A, or 2 through 4. The term includes the aggregate weight of any mixture, solution, or other substance containing a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Unless a statute challenged on equal-protection grounds interferes with a fundamental right or discriminates against a suspect class, we review that statute using the rational-basis test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.