Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 TENN 684 - Ashby v. State

Ashby v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
4
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently September 2014 · most notably State v. Smith (2000), Quinley v. Cocke (1946)

42 state decisions

7019111920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule upon this subject, as announced by the later authorities, and the great weight of authority, is that, while the corpus delicti cannot be established by confessions alone, yet the confessions may be taken in connection with other evidence, direct or circumstantial, corroborating them, and, if from all of the evidence so considered together the corpus delicti and the guilt of the person with reference thereto is established beyond a reasonable doubt, it is the duty of the jury to convict.” Ashby v. State, 124 Tenn. 684, 697, 698 , 139 S. W. 872 , 875.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Undoubtedly some evidence of the corpus delicti should precede the introduction of the confessions of the prisoner, to the extent at least of showing, prima facie (1 Elliott on Ev., Section 292), that a crime has been committed, .... But, if the wrong order be followed in the trial court, it is not reversible error. . . . “All of the elements constituting the corpus delicti may be proven by circumstantial evidence.” Ashby v. State, 124 Tenn. 684, 697-699 , 139 S. W. 872 , 875.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.