Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 Tex. 583 - Commerce Trust Co. v. Best

Commerce Trust Co. v. Best’s Empirical Analysis

1935

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
March 1984
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 1984 · most notably Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Schuenemann (1984), Lubbock Hotel Co. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. (1935)

3 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

180193519401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under this statute, appellees are. allowed to recover double the amount of the interest from the one receiving the same; that is, the one for whose benefit it was paid. In the instant case, the Deming Investment Company, while it collected the usurious interest, did not receive the same within the meaning of this statute, and hence is not the one against whom the suit to recover such penalty can be maintained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`Brashear did pay to, and said bank collected, a sum greater than the original debt would produce at 10 per cent. per annum for the use of the money during the time that payment represented, and the bank became liable for the statutory penalty.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he person paying the same [interest at greater rate than ten per cent] or his legal representative may by an action of debt recover double the amount of such interest from the person, firm, or corporation receiving the same”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.