124 Wash. 2d 504 - State v. Garrett’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland (1995), State v. Hendrickson (1996)
64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Davis v. Alaska · United States v. Morrison · Benjamin v. United States · 109 Wash. 2d 222 - State v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) defense counsel's representation was deficient, i.e., it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness based on consideration of all the circumstances; and (2) defense counsel's deficient representation prejudiced the defendant, i.e., there is a reasonable probability that, except for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McDonald · State v. Brown“defense counsel's deficient representation prejudiced the defendant, i.e., there is a reasonable probability that, except for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grier · State v. Studd“[T]his court will not find ineffective assistance of counsel if `the actions of counsel complained of go to the theory of the case or to trial tactics.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grier · State v. Harstad
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.