124 Wash. 2d 57 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
102 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably 125 Wash. 2d 847 - State v. Lough (1995), State v. Greiff (2000)
102 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dawson v. Delaware · Walker v. Illinois · 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak · 120 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Coria · Johnson v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) its seriousness; (2) whether it involved cumulative evidence; and (3) whether the trial court properly instructed the jury to disregard it.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“`the defendant's actions must have had an impact on . . . `other persons' of a destructive nature that is not normally associated with the commission of the offense in question and this impact must be foreseeable by the defendant.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Perry v. State · Smith v. State“To reverse a sentence which is outside the sentence range, the reviewing court must find: (a) Either that the reasons supplied by the sentencing judge are not supported by the record which was before the judge or that those reasons do not justify a sentence outside the standard range for that offense; or (b) that the sentence imposed was clearly excessive or clearly too lenient.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.