Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 124 W. Va. 399 - Ritchie v. Armentrout

124 W. Va. 399 - Ritchie v. Armentrout’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2007

15 state decisions

501942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Callan v. Wilson · Fuller v. Sylvia · Johnson v. Harrison · Ferris v. Higley · State v. McClear

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the term ‘probate’ in some connections may be limited in meaning to the steps involved in the proving of a will, it more often is understood to include all the ordinary steps and incidents usual and necessary for the administration of estates. Dibble v. Winter, 247 Ill. 243 , 93 N. E. 145 ; Johnson v. Harrison, 47 Minn. 575 , 50 N. W. 923 , 28 Am. St. Rep. 382 ; Reno v. McCully, 65 Ia. 629 , 22 N. W. 902 ; In re Miller’s Estate, 216 Pa. 247 , 65 A. 681 ; In re Guardianship of Strelow, 116 Neb. 873 , 219 N. W. 387 ; Chase Nat. Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., 164 Misc. 508 , 299 N. Y. S. 926; In re Cloward’s Estate, 95 Utah 453 , 82 P. 2d 336 , 119 A. L. R. 123. Also, the ‘settlement of the accounts’ of a fiduciary is often, if not usually, held to include the determination of claims against the estate involved. 24 C. J., p. 924; 15 C. J., p. 1010. This theory was apparently adopted by this Court in Stone v. Simmons, 56 W. Va. 88 , 48 S. E. 841 , in which it is said: ‘In the State of West Virginia the county courts, and the clerks thereof, in vacation, have exclusive original jurisdiction in all probate matters involving the probate of wills and the ordinary administrative proceedings involved in the administration of estates.’ In Page v. Huddleston, 98 W. Va. 104 , 126 S. E. 579 , this Court said: ‘By reason of Section 24, Article 8 of the Constitution of West Virginia, and the statutes enacted in pursuance thereto, county courts have original jurisdiction in all mat”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.