¶1It was competent for the defendant to show that the bill of sale was intended merely as security. The evidence to show this being uncontradicted, should not have been disregarded. Judgment of the Municipal. Court reversed and new trial ordered costs to abide the event. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
125 A.D. 927
Abrams v. Amant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1908
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1908-04-15
Decided 1908-04-15