State v. Canedo’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2009 · most notably State v. Watson (1982), State v. Bracy (1985)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Bonner · Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina · State v. Finley · State v. Garcia · State v. Denny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If a witness has been convicted of a felony, that conviction does not necessarily mean that you cannot believe his testimony. A witness’ conviction of a felony is one of the circumstances you should consider in determing [sic] whether to believe that witness.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Carbajal · State v. Turner“Evidence that the defendant has been convicted of a felony may be considered only for the purpose of determining the credibility of the defendant. Such a conviction does not necessarily mean that you must disbelieve the defendant. It is one of the circumstances that you may consider in weighing the defendant’s testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martinez“Whenever evidence is admitted of other offenses there is an imperative duty on the trial court to clearly instruct the jury as to the restricted and limited purpose for which such evidence is to be considered. 127 Ariz. 200 , 608 P.2d at 777 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.