Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 Cal. App. 337 - People v. Bratton

125 Cal. App. 337 - People v. Bratton’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2014

21 state decisions

80193219401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Myers · People v. Fewkes · 42 Cal. App. 385 - People v. Sing · Carl v. State · State v. Mandich

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he law is that if the different asportations from the same owner are prompted by one design, one purpose, one impulse, they are a single act, without regard to time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.