Webb v. Ambler’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
2 district · 133 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 135 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. Pantanella (1953), 27 Conn. App. 530 - Carnese v. Middleton (1992)
2 district · 133 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davidson v. Poli · Hartford Wheel Club v. Travelers Insurance · Lombardi v. Laudati · Casner v. Resnik · Lamenza v. Shelton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no reason why it (a notice to quit) may not be signed by a duly authorized attorney.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The necessary and only basis of a summary process proceeding is that the lease has been terminated. Webb v. Ambler , 125 Conn. 543 , 550 , 7 A.2d 228 (1939); Feneck v. Nowakowski , 146 Conn. 434 , 436 , 151 A.2d 891 (1959.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It has always been the policy of our law to limit the issues in an action of summary process to a few simple ones within the express scope of the statutory provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.