Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 Conn. App. 113 - State v. Monahan

125 Conn. App. 113 - State v. Monahan’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Golding · Fisher v. United States · State v. Sivri · State v. Hinckley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellate analysis of [a sufficiency of the evidence claim] requires us to undertake a well defined, twofold task. We first review the evidence presented at the trial, construing it in the light most favorable to sustaining the . . . verdict. We then determine whether, upon the facts thus established and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom, the [finder of fact] could reasonably have concluded that the cumulative effect of the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “cursory attention in [his] brief without substantive discussion or citation of authorities”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.