125 Conn. App. 113 - State v. Monahan’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Golding · Fisher v. United States · State v. Sivri · State v. Hinckley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellate analysis of [a sufficiency of the evidence claim] requires us to undertake a well defined, twofold task. We first review the evidence presented at the trial, construing it in the light most favorable to sustaining the . . . verdict. We then determine whether, upon the facts thus established and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom, the [finder of fact] could reasonably have concluded that the cumulative effect of the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“cursory attention in [his] brief without substantive discussion or citation of authorities”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.