Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 F.1d 130 - The Delmar

The Delmar’s Empirical Analysis

125 F. 130 · 1903

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
October 1921
most recently cited

3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1921

3 district ·

10190319101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The New York · The Carroll · The Falcon · The Richmond · Benjamin Haney v. The Baltimore Steam Packet Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Art. 20. When a steam vessel and a sailing vessel are proceeding in such directions as to involve risk of collision, the steam vessel shall keep out of the way of the sailing vessel. “Art. 21. Whore, by any of these rules, one of the two vessels is to keep out of the way the other shall keep her course and speed. “Art. 22. Every vessel which is directed by these rules to keep out of the way of another vessel, shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, avoid crossing ahead of the other. “Art. 23. Every steam vessel which is directed by these rules to keep out of the way of another vessel shall, on approaching her, if necessary, slacken her speed or stop or reverse.” “Art. 27. In obeying and construing these rules duo regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision, and to any special circumstances which may render a departure from the above rules necessary in order to avoid immediate danger.” “Art. 29. Nothing in these rules shall exonerate any vessel or the owner or master or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to carry lights or signals, or of any neglect to keep a proper lookout, or of the neg-; lect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by tbe special circumstances of the case.” Comp. St. §§ 7859-7882, 7880, 7808.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.