Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 F.1d 696 - Campbell v. H. Hackfeld & Co.

Campbell v. H. Hackfeld & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

125 F. 696 · 1903

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
July 2003
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2003

8 federal appellate · 4 district ·

6019031910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Plymouth · Insurance Company v. Dunham · The Anaces

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But this is by no means saying that a tort or injury in no way connected with any vessel, or its owner, officers, or crew, although occurring in such a place or territory, is for that reason within the jurisdiction of the admiralty.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It has * * * been doubted whether the civil admiralty jurisdiction, in cases of tort, does not depend upon the relation of the parties to some ship or vessel and embrace only those tortious violations of maritime right and duty which occur in relation to vessels to which the admiralty jurisdiction in cases of contract applies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The fundamental principle underlying all cases of tort, as well as contract, is that, to bring a case within the jurisdiction of a court of admiralty, maritime relations of some sort must exist, for the all-sufficient reason that the admiralty does not concern itself with non-maritime affairs.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.