Dyer v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis
125 F.2d 192 · 1941
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 1965 · most notably Jones v. Bodaness (1951), Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe (1941)
17 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 33
Relies on Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co. · Abbott v. Coe · Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Coe · Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Coe · Sharp v. Coe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Co-pending applications which, either singly, or in combination with previous patents or other co-pending applications, or both, disclose knowledge inconsistent with a claim of first invention, are available as references.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.