Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 F.2d 282 - McKee v. Johnston

McKee v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

125 F.2d 282 · 1942

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
June 1988
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1988

4 federal appellate ·

2019421950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKee v. Johnston · Poffenbarger v. United States · Poffenbarger v. Aderhold · Touhy v. United States · Colson v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The contention urged by appellants is neither novel nor original; a similar assertion was made, and overruled, in Poffenbarger v. United States, 8 Cir., 20 F.2d 42, 45 , where the court said: ‘It is insisted that the taking of the mail bags and the abstracting of the contents of the bags constitute but one offense. We are unable to agree with this contention. The test of identity of the offenses when double jeopardy is claimed is whether the same evidence is required to sustain them. * * * Additional evidence is required to substantiate and prove the charge of taking and abstracting the contents of the mail bags, than was required to prove the offense of taking the bags from the mail train. We are of the. opinion that the taking of the contents of the mail bags is a separate and distinct offense from the taking of the bags from the mail train. * *’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.