In re Marine Harbor Properties, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
125 F.2d 296 · 1942
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1981
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 546 · 11 U.S.C. § 561 (§ 907 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Massachusetts v. Mellon · Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co. · Great Northern Ry Co v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co · Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No plan was, or could be, submitted by the debtor with its petition, and we see no error in the district judge’s conclusion that the trustees in reorganization should have an opportunity to explore the possibilities and propose a plan before he should decide that it was unreasonable to expect that any reorganization could be effected.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““[I]t is unreasonable to expect that a plan of reorganization can be effected.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.