Miller v. Mangus’s Empirical Analysis
125 F.2d 507 · 1942
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1963
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110
Relies on Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · Continental Illinois Nat Bank Trust Co of Chicago v. Chicago R I & P Ry Co · William Shields v. Robert R Barrow · Kalb v. Feuerstein · Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall immediately subject the farmer and all his property ... for all the purposes of this section, to the exclusive jurisdiction of the court ... including . . . any equity or right in any such property, including, among others, contracts for purchase, contracts for deed, or conditional sales contracts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mangus v. Miller“joint tenants with full right of survivorship and not as tenants in common,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mangus v. Miller
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.