In re Aughenbaugh’s Empirical Analysis
125 F.2d 887 · 1942
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably Nantucket Investors II v. California Federal Bank (1995), Gough v. Titus (1978)
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Crowell v. Benson · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad · Akron Ry Co v. United States · Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Johnson · United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... manifestly there is no hearing when the party does not know what evidence is offered or considered and is not given an opportunity to test, explain, or refute.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he facts to which [the previously filed documents] related, being disputed in the very controversy under consideration, were not the sort of facts of which the referee was entitled to take judicial notice.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.