Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 F.3d 166 - Torres v. Chater

Torres v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

125 F.3d 166 · 1997

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
January 2017
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably Brown v. Apfel (1999), Maggard v. Apfel (1999)

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

260199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Lindh v. Murphy · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “finally adjudicated by the Commissioner of Social Security”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n individual shall not be considered to be disabled for purposes of this subchapter if alcoholism or drug addiction would (but for this subchapter) be a contributing factor material to the Commissioner's determination that the individual is disabled.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is pending a request for either administrative or judicial review with respect to such claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.