Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 F.3d 18 - Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

Bath Iron Works Corp. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor’s Empirical Analysis

125 F.3d 18 · 1997

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2018

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

110199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co. · Santoni v. United States · University of Tennessee v. Elliott · White v. United States · In re Vendo Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he point of collateral estoppel is that the first determination is binding not because it is right but because it was first - and was reached after a full and fair opportunity between the parties to litigate the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he subject [of preclusion in administrative contexts] is a complex one, with many variations; and it is perhaps well not to generalize too broadly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(a) That the claim comes within the provisions of this chapter. . . ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.