United States v. Dees’s Empirical Analysis
125 F.3d 261 · 1997
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably United States v. Benton (2008), United States v. Reyna-Tapia (2003)
30 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Swain v. State of Alabama · United States v. Raddatz · Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the district court retains ultimate control over the [ ] proceedings, which are submitted to the court for its approval,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a critical stage of the criminal proceeding”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Article III judges cannot delegate to magistrate judges final authority over some important issue in a case, as only Article III judges, not their adjuncts, have the power to dispose of cases or controversies.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.