Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 F.3d 324 - Johnson v. Turner

Johnson v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

125 F.3d 324 · 1997

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
February 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2020 · most notably Timothy J. Grendell v. The Ohio Supreme Court, et al. (2001), Wonderland Shopping Center Venture Limited Partnership Macomb Mall Associates Limited Partnership et al. v. Cdc Mortgage Capital Inc et al. (2001)

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

2001997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Younger v. Harris · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only when the matter upon which he acts is clearly outside the subject matter of the court over which he presides.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a federal court has no jurisdiction to hear a case that cannot affect the litigants' rights”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in the clear absence of all jurisdiction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.