Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 F.3d 732 - Freeman v. Arpaio

Freeman v. Arpaio’s Empirical Analysis

125 F.3d 732 · 1997

Citation profile

218
cited by 218 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 17 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 218 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Kay v. Bemis (2007), Shakur v. Schriro (2008)

22 federal appellate · 17 district ·

11501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Bell v. Wolfish · Turner v. Safley · Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. L Smith · Cruz v. Beto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 218 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may not weigh the evidence or make credibility determinations,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In order to show a free exercise violation using the “substantial burden” test, the religious adherent ... has the obligation to prove that a governmental [action] burdens the adherent’s practice of his or her religion ... by preventing him or her from engaging in conduct or having a religious experience which the faith mandates. This interference must be more than an inconvenience; the burden must be substantial and an interference with a tenet or belief that is central to religious doctrine. [Citations omitted.] [Emphasis added.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.