¶1On the trial of one charged with the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, where the evidence submitted by the State tends to show that the defendant was the seller, and the defendant in his statement claims that he was not the seller but was the agent óf the purchaser, and, as such agent, bought the liquor from another person in a county where the sale of intoxicating liquor is prohibited, it is not error for .the court in its charge to state, in effect, that-the evidence shows an illegal sale of liquor, and that the only question is whether the defendant sold the liquor. Judgment affirmed.
125 Ga. 281
Springfield v. State
Decided May 11, 1906
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1906-05-11
<p>Accusation of unlaivful sale of liquor. Before Judge Longley. City court of Dalton. March 3, 1906.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1906-05-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 1955
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →