Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 Idaho 522 - State v. Wade

State v. Wade’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2016

8 state decisions

50199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hernandez · Murray v. State · H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors · State v. Hickman · Henderson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(3) to be represented in any other post-conviction or post-commitment proceeding that the attorney or the needy person considers appropriate, unless the court in which the proceeding is brought determines that it is not a proceeding that a reasonable person with adequate means would be willing to bring at his own expense and is therefore a frivolous proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It appears that subsection 10 was intended by the drafters to be a catch-all exception for those orders that are necessarily part of the criminal process and ought not be delayed until the conclusion of an appeal. A trial court may not reconsider or make post hoe rationalizations of previous rulings once a notice of appeal is filed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.