¶1— The appellant was indicted, prosecuted and convicted for keeping a disorderly liquor shop. The only question presented by the appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of guilty There is evidence tending to prove that the appellant kept a disorderly house, and from which the jury may have very properly found the defendant guilty as charged. This court will not disturb the verdict when there is evidence to support it.
¶2Judgment affirmed, with costs.