Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 KAN 594 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2012

11 state decisions

601928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Tillotson · In re Peck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a result of the marriage, the child had been brought into the home and Edna Taylor, the wife, assumed its care and stood in loco parentis towards it. We think the expression in the statute, minor children of the marriage,’ fairly interpreted included the infant in question, and that the court had the responsibility and duty to make provision for its custody, care and education, when the marriage relation was dissolved.” (p. 596.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““When a divorce is granted the court shall make provision for the guardianship, custody, support and education of the minor children of the marriage, . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.