Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 LA 217 - Andrews v. Sheehy

Andrews v. Sheehy’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently September 1982 · most notably Latham v. Glasscock (1926), Martel Syndicate v. Block (1923)

32 state decisions

120190919101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Dilzell Engineering & Construction Co. v. Lehmann · Andrews v. Sheehy · In re Sheehy · Bartlett v. Fourton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * provided, that when the plaintiff resides out of the State, or in the State, but in a different parish from the defendant, said defendant may institute a demand in reconvention against him for any cause, although such demand be not necessarily connected with, or incidental to the main cause of action * *”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.