Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 125 MICH 1 - People v. Conrad

People v. Conrad’s Empirical Analysis

1900

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
April 1932
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1932

5 state decisions

201900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If it [the lake] were connected with other lakes and streams, so that fish might pass in and out of it, others than the owners would then have an interest in the protection of the fish in the lake.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.